I
found the concept of PTSD pertaining specifically to drone operators very
interesting. focused on the NPR piece by Rachel Martin, Report: High Levels of ‘Burnout’ In U.S. Drone Pilots as well as
the Daily Mail piece by Helen Pow, ‘Did
we just kill a kid?’ Drone warfare is a very new concept and a great
display of the advances that our military technology has faced in just recent
years. Since it is a new kind of warfare, there are new factors that will
affect the soldiers that are manning these drones. The idea of “remote control”
warfare sounds very bittersweet. It is worrisome that a war could be conducted
at the tip of one’s fingers, literally, but at the same time does mean that less
of our troops are directly in harm’s way. However, as I am focusing on the PTSD
that these drone operators are facing. It seems that although it is a very
advanced method of warfare, one that is safer for our troops, it still greatly
affects the soldiers behind the “remote control.”
It’s a different struggle for a soldier
to face when they are killing by simply hitting a button while sitting in a
room full of computers. The story of Brandon Bryant is only what I would
imagine one example of the mental toll these drone operators face after
conducing their missions. Bryant was 27 years old and actually operated drones
(with the Air Force) for 6 whole years. Bryant quit after he ended up killing a
child but the mental distress began right after his first kill. As the article
says, “the first time he fired a missile, he killed two men instantly and cried
on his way home.” Bryant says that he felt “disconnected from humanity for
almost a week.” I was surprised to learn that his immediate distress lasted only
about a week, but his time as a drone operator took a toll on his life overall.
I was especially interested to read that Bryant eventually went back to manning
drones after he faced his own version of a breakdown. Although he is now out of
the military, his role as a drone operator had almost the same PTSD effect of a
soldier that had boots on the ground and faced the same tragedies but in
person.
As Professor Shirk mentioned, only about 4% are
diagnosed with PTSD but that is still not an ideal amount. Operating drones is
an exhausting job both mentally and physically. As the NPR article mentions,
the Pentagon has determined that about 30% of drone operators suffer a term
called ‘burnout’ which just means they are burned out as well as facing high
levels of fatigue. It is interesting that the Air Force does not consider this
a “dangerous level of stress” as it can clearly lead to larger problems later
on. The study does go on to mention that “17% of active duty drone pilots
surveyed are thought to be ‘clinically distressed’… this means the pilots’
stress level has crossed a threshold where it’s now affecting pilots’ work and
family.” The article mentions that many of these pilots say they are not
receiving the proper help for this stress, which is extremely worrisome. It is
a new kind of warfare and technology, so it would be assumed the proper help
would be provided for a new type of military warfare. Although these soldiers
are not “boots on the ground” they still need the counseling as well. There is
absolutely no room for this stress to affect their work because so many lives
are at stake as just the tips of their fingers. It is unsettling that the PTSD
almost seems inevitable with the seemingly lack of mental support for these
soldiers.
I think that drones and the effects it has is much larger than the stress or burnout that it can have on an operator. These two feeling come hand in hand with military action and should be expected. But the disconnection that drones have is a critical one. On the battlefield, soldiers may feel like it is their duty even when their is collateral damage but with a drone, an operator can seem like they are between two environments. This could lead them to have greater psychological problems based on seeing the civilians around them after being at work. Drones were meant to reduce intangible cost but this article seems to show that it has actually done the opposite.
ReplyDelete